The Nigerian Presidency has responded to mounting criticism from former President Goodluck Jonathan and Nobel Laureate Wole Soyinka over the suspension of Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara, defending the decision as necessary to maintain stability and security in the state.
The suspension, which followed the controversial imposition of a state of emergency in Rivers State, has sparked nationwide debate. Critics, including Jonathan and Soyinka, argue that the move undermines democracy and sets a dangerous precedent for federal overreach into state affairs.
Presidency Fires Back
In a statement issued on Sunday, Presidential Spokesperson Bayo Onanuga dismissed the criticisms, insisting that the suspension was based on security intelligence and constitutional provisions.
“The decision to suspend Governor Fubara was made in the best interest of the people of Rivers State. It was not politically motivated but was necessary to prevent an escalation of violence and lawlessness,” the statement read.
Onanuga further accused critics of attempting to politicize the situation. “While we respect the opinions of statesmen like former President Jonathan and Professor Soyinka, we urge them to consider the broader security implications. The federal government cannot stand by and watch as Rivers State descends into chaos.”
Jonathan, Soyinka React
Goodluck Jonathan, who served as governor of Bayelsa State before becoming president, described the suspension as “a dangerous subversion of democratic principles.” He called on the federal government to reconsider its stance, warning that “Nigeria’s democracy must not be sacrificed on the altar of political expediency.”
Wole Soyinka, on his part, condemned the development as “executive recklessness.” In a strongly worded statement, the Nobel Laureate accused the government of “turning constitutional governance into a joke,” adding that such actions erode public trust in democratic institutions.
Growing Political Tension
The controversy surrounding Governor Fubara’s suspension has deepened political divisions in the state. Supporters of the embattled governor staged protests in Port Harcourt, demanding his reinstatement and calling for an independent investigation into the circumstances leading to the state of emergency.
Meanwhile, opposition parties, including the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), have described the situation as “a coup against the will of Rivers people.” PDP National Chairman Umar Damagum accused the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) of using federal might to suppress opposition-controlled states.
Next Steps
Legal experts have weighed in, suggesting that Governor Fubara’s suspension may be challenged in court. Constitutional lawyer Mike Ozekhome argued that “a governor cannot be suspended without due process,” adding that the matter may escalate to the Supreme Court if not resolved politically.
Despite the backlash, the presidency remains firm on its decision, with reports suggesting that consultations are ongoing between the federal government and key political actors in Rivers State.
As the crisis unfolds, Nigerians are closely watching how the situation will be resolved and whether Governor Fubara will be reinstated or permanently removed from office.
